What Started the Controversy
The latest controversy involving Dhruv Rathee began after he criticised the film Dhurandhar, calling it a form of propaganda. His remarks, shared through a video and social media posts, quickly spread online and triggered a strong reaction from audiences and political commentators.
Rathee argued that the film mixes real-life events with fiction in a way that can influence public thinking. According to him, when cinema presents political narratives without clear separation between fact and drama, it can mislead viewers.
Why His Comments Went Viral
Dhurandhar is a high-profile film with a wide audience, and any public criticism naturally draws attention. Dhruv Rathee also has a massive following, especially among young viewers. This combination ensured that his comments did not remain limited to his channel and instead became a trending topic across platforms.
Short video clips and screenshots of his statements circulated rapidly, often without full context, adding fuel to the debate.
Support and Criticism Online
Reactions to Rathee’s remarks were sharply divided. Supporters said his criticism was valid and necessary, arguing that films with political undertones should be questioned and discussed openly. They felt he was encouraging viewers to think critically rather than consume content blindly.
Critics, however, accused him of bias and selective outrage. Many argued that calling a film propaganda was unfair and that Rathee was pushing his own political viewpoint while claiming neutrality.
Dhruv Rathee’s Response
Following the backlash, Rathee did not issue an immediate detailed clarification. Later, he reiterated that his intention was to promote critical thinking and media awareness. He maintained that viewers should question narratives presented through any medium, including cinema.
His response did little to silence critics but reinforced support among his core audience.
Bigger Debate on Influence and Responsibility
The Dhurandhar row has once again highlighted the growing influence of digital creators in India. YouTubers and social media commentators now shape public opinion at a scale once limited to mainstream media. This raises questions about responsibility, balance, and accountability.
The controversy also shows how quickly discussions turn emotional online, with debates often shifting from facts to personal attacks.
The Road Ahead
While the online noise may settle with time, the debate around Dhruv Rathee and political content is unlikely to end. The episode reflects a larger reality of modern India, where cinema, politics, and social media are deeply connected.
For now, the Dhurandhar controversy stands as another example of how one statement can spark a nationwide digital debate.
